Get on the path to results today.

Reported Decisions

image1

Harmon v. Major Chrysler Jeep Dodge, Inc., ___ AD 3d ___ (2nd Dept. Dec. 5, 2012)

Granting judgment in the consumer’s favor where the dealer failed to disclose the vehicle’s lemon-law history prior to purchase. 

Francis v. Atlantic Infinity, Ltd., 64 AD 3d 747 (2ndDept. 2009)

Granting judgment in the consumer’s favor when the dealer failed to repair the vehicle within the time frame allowed by law.

Kucher v. Daimler Chrysler Corp. 20 Misc 3d 64 (2nd Dept. 2008)

Ruling that where the consumer’s lease requires return of his vehicle, the consumer is still entitled to an award of his attorneys’ fees. 

Thomason v. Northport Ford, 43 AD 3d 817 (2ndDept. 2007)

Restoring the customer’s case to the trial calendar after the trial court improperly decided issues of fact.

Matter of Daimler Chrysler v. Spitzer, 7 NY3d 653 (2006)

Decision from the highest court in New York State, ruling that a consumer does not need to demonstrate a defect at the time of trial, instead, it is enough that the defect occurred during the Lemon Law period.